The paper is accepted for publication in principle once the authors have made some revisions in response to the referees comments. Note: Upon acceptance, authors are encouraged to send a short description of the paper and its significance, for release to the media. How to write an email to the editor inquiring about the current status of my paper? If the scale of revisions means that the authors would need a long period of time and the manuscript would need extensive reworking, it may be suitable to reject the manuscript but invite the authors to resubmit. ]]> All Rights Reserved. Each review is due in ten days, and many of them do arrive in two weeks. Decision sent to author NZip for reviewers More importantly, in the rejection letter it was evident that the Editor had taken the time to read through our manuscript and had given it some thought . The science editor has sole responsibility for the decision to accept or reject a manuscript, and that decision is final. Confirm that you would also like to sign up for free personalized email coaching for this stage. Manuscript then goes into said editor's pile, and waits until it gets to the front of the line. Hello. var d=new Date(); yr=d.getFullYear();document.write(yr); When challenging the decision you may receive a letter from the editor explaining . Your manuscript entitled "xxxxxxxxx" has now been seen again by our original reviewers, whose comments are appended below. The editor responsible for the final decision has the discretion however to weight individual reviewer comments as appropriate based on the expertise of each reviewer in the relevant areas and the reviewers . Like other journals in the Nature family, Nature Plants has no external editorial board involved in editorial decision-making. We welcome people and content from all related fields. If authors prefer not to make the review history of their paper at Nature Plants known to a new journal, they should not use the transfer service and they should make a new submission instead; the editors will evaluate the paper without reference to the previous review process. You will receive a letter acknowledging the withdrawal. In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles Clearly show the major revisions in the text, either with a different color text, by highlighting the changes, or with Microsoft Words Track Changes feature. I submitted a manuscript to a Nature journal. If the editors of Nature Plants decline publication of a manuscript, before or after peer review, the authors can easily transfer their manuscript to a different journal within the Nature Portfolio family by following the link provided in the editors decision email. ensure that the paper is at the length specified by the manuscript editor (including number of figures). Register for comprehensive research tips and expert advice on English writing, journal publishing, good publication practices, trends in publishing, and a lot more. So far I have not received any email which tells rejection. 4b. Some potential referees may be engaged in competing work that could influence their opinion. The Science Editor will examine the manuscript to see if it meets the basic acceptance criteria. Most journals are configured to send two reminders before the offer expires. a cover letter that provides any additional information requested by the editors. Instructions for ordering reprints are provided after the paper is scheduled for publication. I think typically desk rejects happen in a few days. Under these circumstances, the editors letter will state explicitly whether or not a resubmitted version would be considered. Editors need to identify, invite and get (often two or more) reviewers to agree to review. ensure that the terminology and notation conform to. Prepublication via Internet or other methods is prohibited. Hopefully, the exact situation will become clear with the next status update. Nearly all manuscripts are returned to the author with suggestions for revision, condensation, or final polish. Your manuscript is already in great shape but please go through our guidelines below that specify the correct formatting of your final resubmission to avoid delays towards formal acceptance. The authors will be sent the comments of the reviewers and Editor and asked to revise accordingly. //--> GSA Bulletin: https://gsabulletin.msubmit.net A decision to send the paper for review can take longer, but usually within a month (in which case the editors send apologies). Many submissions are declined without being sent for review. The first stage for a newly submitted Article is that the editorial staff consider whether to send it for peer-review. I submitted a paper to Nature on Sunday Nov 20. Depending upon the nature of the revisions, the revised paper may be sent out for additional review or it may be accepted directly. One reason is because each referee sees only a tiny fraction of the papers submitted and is deeply knowledgeable about one field, whereas the editors, who see all the papers submitted, can have a broader perspective and a wider context from which to view the paper. To obtain PMID: 26364780 DOI: 10.1017/S0963180115000110 Abstract . Reviewers are notidentified to the authors, except at the request of the reviewer. Full disclosure: Editage Insights is a product of Editage, a global provider of world-class scientific communication solutions. Does "Under Review" mean that the paper has passed the editorial check? We will continue to publish peer reviewer reports where authors opt in to our separate transparent peer review scheme. A referee might be selected for expertise in only one area, for example to judge if a statistical analysis is appropriate, or if a particular technique that is essential to underpin the conclusion has been undertaken properly. Authors will be contacted immediately after a decision has been made. Journal-integrated preprint sharing from Springer Nature and Research Square. After all revisions have been made (papers may be returned to the author more than once for revision), if the paper is found suitable for publication in a GSA journal, the Science Editor will send a final decision letter to the author, accepting the manuscript for publication. What does it mean if the status is 'under consideration' for two weeks? Technical reasons for rejection include: These rejection reasons can be avoided by investing enough time in reading around the subject area, carefully deciding on the topic to focus on, the hypothesis and planning a comprehensive experiment as outlined in the Springer Nature Journal Tutorial: Writing a Journal Manuscript. Generally, only one letter defending your submission will be accepted for each of the review stages (editorial review and peer review). Upon transfer, if the manuscript is assessed by the receiving journal to be a good fit and technically sound, it may be accepted without further review. Poor analysis such as using inappropriate statistical tests or a lack of statistics altogether. All of these points are covered in the Writing a Journal Manuscript and the Writing in English tutorials. Proofs are cycled between Natures production staff, our typesetter and the author by means of an online production-tracking system. At each stage, the editor will discuss the manuscript with editorial colleagues in the light of referees reports, and send a letter to the author offering one of the following options: Editors letters also contain detailed guidance about the papers format and style where appropriate (see below), which should be read in conjunction with the manuscript formatting guide when revising and resubmitting. This should not be a repetition of what you have included in your original submission or cover letter. [CDATA[> Reviewer comment: In your analysis of the data you have chosen to use a somewhat obscure fitting function (regression). My paper was published in a journal in 2021 october. For more information, please see our In the case where all editors have made a decision (or been terminated), and the letter has not been set by an editor during their decision step, it must be sent as a separate action. Plants) Authors Holly Kantin, David Wendler. If the manuscript has been peer-reviewed, authors should include a note explaining any changes made to the manuscript compared to the original Nature Plants submission, along with a separate point-by-point response to the reviewer reports. HANDBOOK: Keep calm and wait: A guide to understanding journal statuses. As appeals are matters of journal policy they are given lower priority than new submissions and may take at least several weeks, if not longer, to resolve. Also you have to assume people have been off for the holiday. The author is provided with a due date for submission of a revised paper. TIP: journals have different revision deadlines which vary from as little as a few weeks to three months depending on the revisions that need to be made. Decisions are quicker, and editorial criteria can be made uniform across disciplines. However, on occasion editors might consult with expert researchers when deciding whether to review a paper. When all the reviewer reports are received, the editors decide to either: If you are invited to revise and resubmit your manuscript, you should follow the instructions provided by the editor in their decision email. Decisions are reversed. Pepperidge Farm Molasses Crisp Cookies, Legends Burgers Menu Calories, Articles D